Buyer's Comparison
Richard Mille RM 67 vs Patek Aquanaut
The Richard Mille RM 67 and the Patek Philippe Aquanaut are two interpretations of the ultra-thin modern luxury sports watch — both designed for wear-and-forget comfort, both representing their respective brand's contemporary aesthetic, and both occupying meaningfully different price tiers despite functional similarity. The RM 67-02 ultra-thin is grade-5 titanium tonneau-shape, automatic with skeletonised dial, 6.3mm thick, weighing roughly 32 grams cased and bracelet combined — the lightest serious luxury sports watch ever produced. The Aquanaut 5167A is 40mm rounded-octagonal stainless steel, 8.1mm thick, on tropical rubber strap, with the in-house Calibre 324 S C automatic. The RM 67-02 trades $80,000–$120,000; the Aquanaut 5167A trades $35,000–$50,000. Both are excellent ultra-thin sports watches; the RM 67 is the more visually distinctive and the technically more extreme; the Aquanaut is the more rationally priced and the more universally wearable luxury sports watch.
Option A
Richard Mille RM 67
The ultra-thin titanium tonneau
Best For
- Maximum lightness
- Visual distinctiveness
- Unconstrained budgets
Option B
Patek Aquanaut
The modern Patek sports watch
Best For
- More rational pricing
- Better universal wearability
- Patek brand
The Verdict
The Aquanaut for a more rationally priced ultra-thin luxury sport on rubber. The RM 67-02 if budget is unconstrained and you want the lightest, most visually distinctive ultra-thin sports watch on the market.
In Stock
Patek Aquanaut — Available
FAQ
Richard Mille RM 67 vs Patek Aquanaut — Buyer Questions
Need a recommendation?
Talk to a specialist before you buy.
Our team has placed every reference on this page on dozens of wrists. Tell us your wear pattern and budget — we'll point you to the right one.
